Business Letter

1770 East Palomar St

Chula Vista, CA, 91913

September 21, 2011

Mrs. Esther Vargas

Congressman

Olympian High School

1925 Magdalena Ave.

Chula Vista, CA, 91913

Dear Congresswoman Vargas,

I am writing to you in regards of whether California should have a Good Samaritan Law. I believe we should not have a Good Samaritan Law due to society's behavior and actions today.

Whether we have the Good Samaritan Law or not, there can still be complications and they might start problems between the Samaritan and the person who got saved. For instance, If someone where to see someone drowning, and they are not someone who is certified to save them, like a lifeguard, they could get sued for some "complications" that could happen during their act of kindness. Today's society has many things to worry about already, such as jobs, school, or even taking care of children or other family members. With so many worries, to add the care of other people to the list would just add to the stress of others. Also, today's society includes violence, such as gangs or drug dealers. People today are afraid to step in to help someone who is getting harassed, not knowing if and how they will get hurt in return for their heroic act.

Thank you for taking the time to read my letter. I hope you consider my opinion and my reasoning.

Sincerely.

Annaly Onate

Business Letter

1812 Olive Green Street
Chula Vista, CA, 91913
September 21, 2011

Miss Sandra Decalf
Congresswoman
Olympian High School
1925 Magdalena Ave.
Chula Vista, CA, 91913

Dear Congresswoman Decalf,

      I am writing to you to discuss the matters of the Good Samaritan Law. I believe we should not have a Good Samaritan Law based on our society today and on moral behavior.

      In our society we already have too many things to worry about. This law would just add on to the worries we already have such as work and maybe even taking care of kids. With this added law, people would also have to worry about the people in need who might be actually deceiving them for an unknown reason or about getting sued by someone that they did help but something went wrong. Having a Good Samaritan Law will also take away the moral of abetting somebody out of the goodness of there heart. Most Americans are raised on the thought that abetting someone without asking for anything in return is a benefit to the helper and the helped. For self-esteem and pride. But if it is required by law to abet someone then the value of the moral goes down.

       I thank you for your consideration in reading this and I hope you also consider my opinion on the matter.

Respectively,

Keony Lardizabal

Business Letter

143 Seasame Street
San Antonio, TX 90210
September 21, 2011


Mr. Peter Sherman
Congressman
Olympian High School
42 Wallaby Way
Chula Vista, CA 12345



Dear Congressman Sherman:

In regards to implementing a Good Samaritan Law, I believe that we should not have a Good Samaritan Law because it may bring upon more consequences that are needed, it will put more citizens in danger, and we may even endanger the citizen already in need of aid.

We can put ourselves in danger when helping a person because many citizens are not qualified or trained to help save a person's life in a dangerous situation. Also, in the act of trying to abet someone, we may injure or harm them futher, and therefore, legal action may have to be used to resolve problems that were caused by the harm done. Lastly, we as Americans cannot force anyone to help one another because that it is unethical to force someone to do something that may bring more harm than good in a society that is becoming more dangerous and unpredictable.

Thank you for your time and consideration, please contact me to let me know your perspective.


Sincerely,



Kaylin Diaz

Business Letter - Frida Perez

7576 Candy Way
Chula Vista, CA, 91913
September 21, 2011


Mrs. Polka Dot
Congresswoman
Olympian High School
1925 Magdalena Ave.
Chula Vista, Ca, 91913


Dear Congresswoman Dot,


I am writing to you in regards of whether or not California should implement the Good Samaritan law. I disagree with the Good Samaritan law because being a Good Samaritan should be of a personal act of kindness.

A Good Samaritan law may seem beneficial but may cause many legal problems. Being a Good Samaritan should be encouraged rather than implemented. For example, if you see someone who had just fainted and perform CPR incorrectly, the issue may get worse and you may end up being sued. That is also the reason why the Good Samaritan law would not be beneficial to you or the victim.

Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule to read this letter. I hope you take it into consideration.

Sincerely,




Frida Perez

Business Letter

1444 Blairwood Ave.
Chula Vista, CA, 91913
20 September 2011



Mrs. Sarah Dessen
Congresswoman
Olympian High School
1925 Magdalena Ave.
Chula Vista, CA, 91913




Dear Congresswoman Dessen,

I am writting this letter to you, because I believe that we should have a Good Samaritan Law. The Good Samaritan Law will create a better society to all.

In my opinion we should have a Good Samaritan Law because you help others in need. Most of the time people are in need, especially the elderly, once having the Good Samaritan Law everything will be easier. The Good Samaritan Law will not only help pepole in need, but also it would set a great example for all the other states that do not have the law. It would speak really good of us.

Thank you for your time, and I hope you can cosider my opinion.


Sincerely,




Alexa Calderon

business letter-alissa hernandez

1568 shasta st.
Chula Vista Ca, 91913
September 20, 2011


Mr. Charlie Brown
Congressman
Olympian High School
1925 Magdalena Ave
Chula Vista, CA, 91913


Dear Congressman Brown,

I am addressing you in regards to whether or not California should implement a Good Samaritan Law. I firmly disagree with the Good Samritan Law due to numerous reasons including how lawsuits or future problems can occur if this law passes.

Having a Good Samaritan Law may seem like a good idea and may be beneficial but then again it has its negative problems. Even though it may seem like a smart way to have someone help another person out, it may lead to serious obstacles. For example, if a victim is hurt and someone decides to help out and something goes wrong while helping the victim out, the victim may sue the person helping him/her out. A Good Samaritan is helping a person out by the kindness of their heart, when they willingly choose to help out the community not when they are forced to help someone out. Therefore a Good Samaritan Law should not be enforced due to these reasons.

Thank you for taking time to read this. I appreciate if you take my opinion into deep consideration.




Alissa Hernandez

Business Letter

1050 River Dr.
Chula Vista, CA, 91911
20 September 2011

Mr.Victor Sparks
Congressman
Olympian High School
1925 Magdalena Ave.
Chula Vista, CA, 91913

Dear Congressman Sparks:

I am writing this letter to you, regarding wheter or not we should have a "Good Samaritan" Law. I would like to explain to you, why I think it is a great idea to have a "Good Samaritan" law.

I honestly think that the U.S.A should have a "Good Samaritan" law, since it is going to help many people out there. Many times we see people that are in need and we do not stop and help them out, since we do not have a law that enforces us to help. In another hand, if we had a "Good Samaritan" law we would be obligated to stop and help, that would lead to a better situation since we can help to save someone's life. Our society would become more united over time, thanks to the law.

Thank you for your time, and I hope you consider my point of view.

Sincerely,

Arlette Arenas